Added: Fernandez Vigil - Date: 01.07.2021 11:47 - Views: 43630 - Clicks: 2466
Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. Sexting has stirred debate over its legality and safety, but few researchers have documented the relationship between sexting and health. We describe the sexting behavior of young adults in the United States, and examine its association with sexual behavior and psychological well-being. We examined participant sexting behavior using 4 of sexting: 1 Non-Sexters, 2 Receivers, 3 Senders, and 4 Two-way Sexters. We then assessed the relationships between sexting and sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behavior and psychological well-being.
Males were more likely to be Receivers than females. Sexually active respondents were more likely to be Two-way Sexters than non-sexually active respondents. Among participants who were sexually active in the past 30 days, we found no differences across sexting groups in of sexual partners, or of unprotected sex partners in the past 30 days.
We also found no relationship between sexting and psychological well-being. Our suggest that sexting is not related to sexual risk behavior or psychological well-being. We discuss the findings of this study and propose directions for further research on sexting. Sexting, which describes sharing sexually suggestive photos or messages through cell phones and other mobile media [ 1 ], is rapidly becoming part of the dating process [ 2 ]. Recently, this behavior has stirred substantial concern over its legality and safety [ 34 ]. While existing surveys document the prevalence among young adults YAs and demographic characteristics associated with sexting, there is little systematic research on the relationship between sexting and health behaviors commonly assumed to be linked to sexting e.
It is critical to understand this relationship to determine if and how public health resources should be devoted to sexting. Sincecross sectional studies have examined the prevalence of sexting behavior among teens and YAs [ 25 — 7 ]. Frequent users of cell phones and social networking technology, as well as single adults reported sexting more than low technology users or married adults respectively [ 7 ]. They also found that sexually active youth were twice as likely to share naked photos compared to their non-sexually active peers [ 5 ].
While informative, these findings do not elucidate if sexting is related to self-reported sexual risk behaviors. Researchers have proposed three perspectives regarding the relationship between sexting and sexual behavior: 1 sexting may lead to risky sexual behaviors such as early sexual initiation and less contraceptive use [ 8 ], 2 sexting may be a safer sex behavior if it is used in lieu of physical contact [ 2 ], or 3 sexting may reflect a new medium for the longstanding practice of photo sharing in romantic and sexual relationships and have no association with safer or riskier sex behaviors [ 1 ].
It is vital to understand how sexting is related to sexual behaviors as it could be promoted as a safer sex behavior or become a focus of intervention to prevent risky sexual behavior. Media reports and scholars have also proposed a relationship between sexting and psychological well-being [ 9 — 11 ]. People with social anxiety may prefer texting to voice calls as a medium for intimate contact, and may also prefer sexting as a medium for sexual contact [ sexters phone numbers12 ]. Other researchers and the media raise concern over the psychological consequences of sexting.
The spread of sext messages beyond the original recipient and pressure to sext are both common occurrences [ 56 ] and may be related to subsequent psychological distress [ 313 ]. In addition, a of dating violence education programs have included unwanted text and sext messages in their definitions of dating violence [ 1213 ].
To date, researchers have not tested the relationship between sexting and symptoms of psychological well-being directly. The absence of such data is a concerning gap in our understanding given that if sexting is related to adverse mental health, intervention is critical to prevent or mitigate negative outcomes.
Our study has three goals. First, we describe the prevalence of sexting in a large national sample of 18—24 year old YAs in the United States. We break sexters phone numbers into four : 1 Non-Sexters neither sent nor received a sext2 Senders sent a sext but never received a sext3 Receivers received a sext but never sent a sextand 4 Two-way Sexters both sent and received a sext.
Second, we examine whether participants who engage in different sexting behaviors differ in their sociodemographic characteristics. We discuss the implications of sexting for YAs and suggest directions for both research and practice. To be eligible for the study, respondents had to be between the ages of 18 and 24, live in the United States and have access to the Internet.
The first wave of participants seeds was recruited through an online Facebook advertisement. The remainder of the sample was recruited through referral chains. The majority of participants identified as heterosexual Each prospective participant logged sexters phone numbers the survey portal using a unique identifying UID and completed a short eligibility screener.
Eligible participants consented to the study and completed the survey.
On average, the questionnaire took 37 minutes to complete. Data were protected with a bit SSL encryption and kept on a secure firewalled server at the University of Michigan. Data quality checks were carried out to circumvent duplicate and fraudulent entries [ 1415 ]. Respondents answered two questions regarding their lifetime sexting behavior.
Using definitions provided by the Pew Internet and American Life Project [ 7 ], we asked participants if they had ever sexted i. Next, we asked if they had ever received a sext i. We created a lifetime sexting behavior status variable with four : 1 Non-Sexters, 2 Senders, 3 Receivers, 4 Two-way sexters. Sexually-active youth reported the of male and female partners they had in the past 30 days, respectively. We calculated the total of sexual partners in past 30 days by adding the reported for male and female partners. Participants also reported the of unprotected sex partners in the past 30 days for vaginal sex and sexters phone numbers anal sex.
We used these proportions as indicators of sexual risk behavior. We selected this short form in order to limit the of survey items and reduce participant burden. Items e. Mean depression score was calculated by reverse scoring positively worded items e. Anxiety symptoms were sexters phone numbers using the anxiety subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory [ 18 ]. We assessed self-esteem using the item Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale [ 19 ]. Participants responded to items e.
We created a mean composite self-esteem score. We calculated participant age by subtracting their month and year of birth from the date of study participation. We asked participants how many YAs they had contact with in the past 3 months, and of those who they were in contact with, how many they usually communicated with by phone or text.
Participants recruited via RDS are linked by their recruitment chains and are therefore correlated. We computed a statistical weight RDS2 to correct for clustering that resulted from the network-referral procedures [ 20 ]. In subsequent analyses, we weighted the RDS2 weight [ 20 ]. Data were analyzed in three steps. First, we used crosstabs to examine the intersection between sending and receiving a sext message and to create sexting status.
Second, we analyzed bivariate relationships between sexting status and variables of interest. For continuous variables, we used analysis of variance ANOVA with post hoc Scheffe tests to compare mean scores across sexting groups. We tested the association between sexting and categorical variables using Chi-Square tests and odds ratios.
Multivariate and bivariate were the same for all predictors. Of the respondents in the weighted sample, A greater percentage of males Only participants with full sexting data were included in analyses; demographic characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
from bivariate analyses are sexters phone numbers in Table 3. When we looked at only those respondents who reported being sexually active in the past 30 days, we found no association between sexting behavior and of partners, proportion of unprotected vaginal sex or proportion of unprotected anal sex partners. Our indicate that sexting is a prevalent behavior among YAs and show rates of sending and receiving sexts are slightly higher than other recent findings [ 7 ].
These differences may be attributable to age differences in the samples. It is also possible that sexting is increasing due to technological advances. Longitudinal data are needed for us to know if sexting is increasing among YAs. Our also suggest that sexting is most often a reciprocal behavior. Given findings that most young men and women report sharing sexts within a dating relationship [ 622 ], it is likely that our findings reflect sexting between romantic partners. Similar to Lenhart [ 7 ], we found that males are more likely than females to receive a sext without sending one.
These could be attributed in part to males receiving photos that were originally intended for someone else. When males receive forwarded sexts, they may not be a part of a reciprocal sexting relationship and therefore not sending content in return. This finding may also reflect sexual objectification [ 23 ] being enacted through technology.Sexters phone numbers
email: [email protected] - phone:(266) 206-5758 x 8290
Sext and Send Nudes to Local Girls